|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1982128. ; Size: 434K
|
|
The Political Economy of Dodd-Frank: Why Financial Reform Tends to be Frustrated and Systemic Risk Perpetuated
John C. Coffee Jr. Columbia Law School; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); American Academy of Arts & Sciences
January 9, 2012
Cornell Law Review, 2012 Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 414
Abstract:
Several commentators have argued that financial “reform” legislation enacted after a market crash is invariably flawed, results in “quack corporate governance” and “bubble laws,” and should be discouraged. This criticism has been specifically directed at both the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act. This article presents a rival perspective. Investors, it argues, are naturally dispersed and poorly organized and so constitute a classic “latent group” (in Mancur Olson’s terminology). Such latent groups tend to be dominated by smaller, but more cohesive and better funded special interest groups in the competition to shape legislation and influence regulatory policy. This domination is interrupted, however, by major crises, which encourage “political entrepreneurs” to bear the transaction costs of organizing latent interest groups to take effective action. But such republican triumphs prove temporary, because, after the crisis subsides, the hegemony of the better organized interest groups is restored.
As a result, a persistent cycle that this article calls the “Regulatory Sine Curve” can be observed: the legislative success of the latent investor group is followed by increasingly equivocal implementation of the new legislation, tepid enforcement, and eventual legislative erosion. This article traces that pattern with respect to both the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the ongoing implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act.
This article does not deny that “reform” legislation often contains flaws (as does much deregulatory legislation). But these are usually quickly eliminated in the latter half of the cycle. The greater dilemma is instead whether the problem of systemic risk can be satisfactorily addressed in the presence of the Regulatory Sine Curve.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 85
Keywords: Dodd-Frank Act, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, financial regulation, latent group, securities regulation, regulatory sine curve, Basel III
JEL Classification: E58, G18, G28, G30, G32, G38, K20, K22, K23
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: January 10, 2012
Suggested CitationCoffee, John C., The Political Economy of Dodd-Frank: Why Financial Reform Tends to be Frustrated
and Systemic Risk Perpetuated (January 9, 2012). Cornell Law Review, 2012; Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 414. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1982128
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
|
|
|
|