Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1983224
 
 

Footnotes (12)



 


 



Does Article V Restrict the States to Calling Unlimited Conventions Only? – A Letter to a Colleague


William W. Van Alstyne


Duke University School of Law; William & Mary Law School

March 9, 1979

Duke Law Journal, Vol. January, No. 6, 1979
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-202

Abstract:     
From time to time, various state legislatures have adopted resolutions designed to require Congress to call a limited convention in which one or another possible amendments to the Constitution might be proposed. In 1967, thirty-two states, two short of the requisite two-thirds filed such resolutions requesting a convention for the purpose of considering an amendment to "overrule" the Supreme Court's principal reapportionment decisions. In 1971, Senator Ervin of North Carolina introduced a bill to provide guidelines to be followed upon a state call for a convention. This year, approximately twenty-eight states have adopted some kind of resolution for the purpose of considering an amendment to impose fiscal restraint upon the federal government-to require a "balanced budget. "

Curiously, the convention mode of proposing amendments remains completely untested - no such convention has ever been assembled. Yet the amending convention obviously is contemplated by article V of the Constitution: "The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress...."

Several scholars, including Professors Charles L. Black, Jr. and Bruce A. Ackerman, both of Yale Law School, have argued that unless the state legislative resolution reflects a desire to convoke a constitutional convention having the authority to propose an unlimited variety of fundamental changes in the Constitution, Congress should treat the state resolution as a nullity. Recently, Professor Ackerman sent Professor Van Alstyne a reprint of his New Republic editorial and asked Professor Van Alstyne whether he had "any thoughts on this. " The following is Professor Van Alstyne's reply.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: amendment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 12, 2012 ; Last revised: January 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Van Alstyne, William W., Does Article V Restrict the States to Calling Unlimited Conventions Only? – A Letter to a Colleague (March 9, 1979). Duke Law Journal, Vol. January, No. 6, 1979; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-202. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1983224

Contact Information

William W. Van Alstyne (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 362
Downloads: 11
Footnotes:  12

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds