Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1983263
 
 

Footnotes (281)



 


 



Linking the Questions: Judicial Supremacy as a Matter of Constitutional Interpretation


Tabatha Abu El-Haj


Drexel University School of Law

January 11, 2012

Washington University Law Review, Vol. 89, 2012
Drexel University Earle Mack School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-A-01

Abstract:     
This Article explains that what has been missing from the debate between advocates of popular constitutionalism and defenders of judicial supremacy is any account of the practice of constitutional interpretation. Without a clear sense of what constitutional interpretation involves, we cannot assess the prevailing assumption that the Supreme Court is uniquely positioned to interpret the Constitution or explore an expertise-based justification for its claim to finality. The Article, therefore, revisits the debate about judicial supremacy by starting, not with history or politics, but with constitutional interpretation itself.

Having explored the practice of constitutional interpretation, it concludes that the Supreme Court can claim expertise with respect to determining constitutional meaning, but that its expertise has limits. The Article proceeds to explore whether and how this insight might be translated into limits to judicial supremacy. Toward that end, it develops a framework for assessing when the work of constitutional interpretation should be shared between the Supreme Court, the other branches of government, and the public itself. Finally, it uses the Court’s doctrine with respect to race-conscious legislative districting to illustrate how the proposed framework might work.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 66

Keywords: Judicial supremacy, Popular Constitutionalism, Voting Rights, Voting Rights Act, Constitutional Interpretation, Federalism, Redistricting

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 12, 2012 ; Last revised: April 14, 2012

Suggested Citation

Abu El-Haj, Tabatha, Linking the Questions: Judicial Supremacy as a Matter of Constitutional Interpretation (January 11, 2012). Washington University Law Review, Vol. 89, 2012; Drexel University Earle Mack School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-A-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1983263

Contact Information

Tabatha Abu El-Haj (Contact Author)
Drexel University School of Law ( email )
3320 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.earlemacklaw.drexel.edu/faculty/FacultyProfiles/Tabatha%20Abu%20El-Haj/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 920
Downloads: 136
Download Rank: 123,165
Footnotes:  281

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.610 seconds