On Implications of Demand Censoring in the Newsvendor Problem
Columbia Business School - Decision Risk and Operations
University of Texas at Dallas - Naveen Jindal School of Management
January 12, 2010
Management Science, June 2013, Vol. 59, No. 6, 1407-1424
Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 12-7
We consider a repeated newsvendor problem in which the decision-maker (DM) does not have access to the underlying demand distribution. The goal of the paper is to characterize the implications of demand censoring on performance. To that end, we compare the benchmark setting in which the DM has access to demand observations to a setting in which the DM may only rely on sales data. We measure performance in terms of regret: the difference between the cumulative costs of a policy and the optimal cumulative costs with knowledge of the demand distribution. Through upper and lower bounds, we characterize the optimal magnitude of the worst case regret for the two settings, enabling one to isolate the implications of demand censoring. In particular, the results imply that the exploration-exploitation trade-off introduced by demand censoring is fundamentally different in the continuous and discrete demand cases, and that active exploration plays a much stronger role in the latter case. We further establish that in the discrete demand case, the need for active exploration almost disappears as soon as a lost sales indicator (that records whether demand was censored or not) becomes available, in addition to the censored demand samples.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: inventory management, newsvendor, estimation, nonparametric, demand censoringAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 12, 2012 ; Last revised: July 13, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds