The Media and the Courts: Towards Competitive Supervision?

China Quarterly, Vol. 208, pp. 833-850, 2011

Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 12-296

Posted: 12 Jan 2012 Last revised: 2 Mar 2012

Date Written: December 11, 2012

Abstract

Scholarship on Chinese governance has examined a range of factors that help to explain the resilience of authoritarianism. One understudied aspect of regime resilience and institutionalization has been the growing importance of supervision by a range of party-state entities. Examining court-media relations in China demonstrates that “competitive supervision” is an increasingly important tool for increasing state responsiveness and improving accountability. Court-media relations suggest that China is seeking to develop novel forms of horizontal accountability. Placing such relations in a broader institutional context also helps to explain why common paradigms used to analyze them may be inapplicable in China.

Keywords: China, courts, media, supervision, horizontal accountability, authoritarianism

Suggested Citation

Liebman, Benjamin L., The Media and the Courts: Towards Competitive Supervision? (December 11, 2012). China Quarterly, Vol. 208, pp. 833-850, 2011, Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 12-296, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1983325

Benjamin L. Liebman (Contact Author)

Columbia University - Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,033
PlumX Metrics