Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1984732
 


 



Padilla v. Kentucky: The Effect of Plea Colloquy Warnings on Defendants' Ability to Bring Successful Padilla Claims


Danielle Marie Lang


Yale University - Law School

January 1, 2012

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 121, No. 4, p. 944, 2012

Abstract:     
In Padilla v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court held that a lawyer’s failure to advise her noncitizen client of the deportation consequences of a guilty plea constitutes deficient performance of counsel in violation of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights. In the plea context, defendants are also protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and the Due Process Clause, which requires that judges and defendants engage in a conversation regarding the consequences of the plea — the so-called “plea colloquy” — before the defendant can enter a valid guilty plea.

In many plea colloquies, judges issue general warnings to defendants regarding the immigration consequences of a guilty plea. Since Padilla, a number of lower courts have held that such general court warnings prevent a defendant from proving prejudice and prevailing on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim where there might otherwise be a Padilla Sixth Amendment violation.

This Note argues that those rulings mistakenly conflate the role of the court in a Fifth Amendment plea colloquy and the role of counsel under the Sixth Amendment and, further, that they misread the clear directives of Padilla. In the plea context, the court and defense counsel serve complementary but distinct functions in our constitutional structure; neither can replace the other, and the failure of either court or counsel constitutes a breakdown in our system. Circumscribing Padilla’s requirements by allowing plea colloquies to “cure” the prejudice created by Sixth Amendment Padilla violations is problematic because the Fifth Amendment plea colloquy provides significantly less protection to criminal defendants. Thus, the substitution of the plea colloquy for advice from counsel will substantially undercut the Padilla decision.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 13, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Lang, Danielle Marie, Padilla v. Kentucky: The Effect of Plea Colloquy Warnings on Defendants' Ability to Bring Successful Padilla Claims (January 1, 2012). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 121, No. 4, p. 944, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1984732

Contact Information

Danielle Marie Lang (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,115
Downloads: 158
Download Rank: 109,851

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds