|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1985776. ; Size: 47K
|
|
Family Firm, Audit Fee and Auditor Choice: Australian Evidence
Arifur Khan Deakin University - School of Accounting, Economics and Finance
Nava Subramaniam Deakin University
January 15, 2012
2012 Financial Markets & Corporate Governance Conference
Abstract:
This study aims to examine the relation between family ownership and control, and audit fee and auditor choice in Australian companies. The dominance of concentrated ownership and related institutional features of Australia offers an interesting opportunity to examine the key role family ownership and control plays as a determinant of audit fee as well as auditor choice. Agency theory suggests a mixed perspective on the agency problems that are inherent in family firms and thence their implications for audit pricing and auditor choice. We find that family firms pay higher audit fee than non-family firms. Moreover, family share ownership is related with higher audit fee. This is consistent with supply-side theory (i.e., higher assessed client-related risks due to family owners’ expropriation, poor monitoring of management, and higher information asymmetry) on the determinants of audit fee. We also find that compared to non-family firms, family firms are more likely to appoint big 4 auditors to ensure quality audit and reduce higher agency costs perceived by the market.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 1
Keywords: Family ownership, audit fee, auditor choice
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: January 16, 2012
Suggested CitationKhan, Arifur and Subramaniam, Nava, Family Firm, Audit Fee and Auditor Choice: Australian Evidence (January 15, 2012). 2012 Financial Markets & Corporate Governance Conference. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1985776 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1985776
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
Audit and Nonaudit Fees from Different Reporting Regimes and Perceived Audit Quality
By
Mohinder Parkash,
Rajeev Singhal, ...
2.
Ownership Concentration, Family Control, and Auditor Choice: Evidence from an Emerging Market
By
Salim Darmadi
3.
Audit Fees, Nonaudit Fees, and Auditor Quality: An Analysis from the Indian Perspective
By
Renu Desai,
Vikram Desai, ...
4.
Does Audit Market Concentration Harm the Quality of Audited Earnings? Evidence from Audit Markets in 42 Countries
By
Jere Francis,
Paul Michas, ...
5.
Geographic Proximity between Auditor and Client: How Does it Impact Audit Quality?
By
Jong-hag Choi,
Jeong-bon Kim, ...
6.
Audit Committee Expertise and Financial Analysts’ and Investors’ Ability to Anticipate Future Earnings
By
John Abernathy,
Tony Kang, ...
7.
Audit Firm Tenure and Audit Quality: Evidence from U.S. Firms
By
Li Brooks,
C.s. Agnes Cheng, ...
8.
Client-Auditor Supply Chain Relationships, Audit Quality, and Audit Pricing
By
Karla Johnstone,
Chan Li, ...
9.
Do Joint Audits Improve Audit Quality? Evidence from Voluntary Joint Audits
By
Elina Haapamäki,
Tuukka Järvinen, ...
10.
Intra-Audit Firm Office Changes, Audit Pricing and Accrual Quality
By
Jamie Diaz
|
|
|
|