Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1986853
 


 



The Cross-Dressing Case for Bathroom Equality


Jennifer Levi


Western New England University School of Law

Daniel Redman


affiliation not provided to SSRN

January 17, 2010

Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 34, p. 133, 2010

Abstract:     
This Article offers a new set of arguments for transgender equality based on a little-known series of cases in which courts declined to enforce cross-dressing laws against transgender defendants. As shown below, the arguments brought by the defenders of these laws closely mirror the arguments brought today in favor of bathroom discrimination. The Authors discuss both the bathroom and cross-dressing debates in historical context, draw out the underlying reasoning in the two sets of cases,and argue that the reasoning that supports bathroom discrimination is as flawed as the reasoning behind criminal cross-dressing laws. The analysis also suggests that, just as the arguments for cross-dressing prohibitions have not withstood advances in public understanding of transgender people and their lives, neither will the arguments for bathroom discrimination.

In Part I, the Authors discuss the current state of the law, present personal testimonials of transgender people denied bathroom access, place the bathroom debate in historical context, and show how that debate evolved to the present day. In Part II, the Authors analyze the body of case law dealing with bathroom access and discrimination, outlining the types of arguments brought by anti-transgender advocates to justify withholding bathroom access: preventing fraud and crime, discouraging overt homosexuality, and enforcing gender norms. Part III analyzes the body of case law dealing with the cross-dressing laws, demonstrate that defendants used the same arguments being used today in the bathroom context, and show how the courts rejected these arguments. Part IV compares the two bodies of case law and offer new arguments for bathroom-access equality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: bathroom access, transgender rights, cross dressing, bathroom discrimination, transgender advocates, discrimination claims, civil rights and discrimination, sexuality and the law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 18, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Levi, Jennifer and Redman, Daniel, The Cross-Dressing Case for Bathroom Equality (January 17, 2010). Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 34, p. 133, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1986853

Contact Information

Jennifer Levi (Contact Author)
Western New England University School of Law ( email )
1215 Wilbraham Road
Springfield, MA 01119
United States

Daniel Redman
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 454
Downloads: 31

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.266 seconds