|
||||
|
||||
The Procedural Democratic Legitimacy of Constitutional CourtsRoss CarrickUniversity of Oxford January 17, 2012 Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2012/01 Abstract: This research focuses on the democratic role of courts, and presents an original conceptual framework for an examination thereof. The core thesis of this paper is to provide a new answer to the question – how can courts (in particular constitutional courts) be democratically legitimate? – by considering how a constitutional court can be procedurally democratically legitimate. There are two dimensions of procedural democratic legitimacy: intrinsic and instrumental. The intrinsic is a measure of the democratic credentials of the constitutional court as a discrete decision-making authority, whereas the instrumental is concerned with the ways in which the constitutional court contributes to the democratic functioning of the polity. Finally, the conceptual framework is put to the test by examining the constitutional court of the democratically complex and contested EU polity: the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 67 Keywords: Constitutional Courts, Constitutional Theory, Democratic Theory, Legitimacy, the Court of Justice of the European Union, Democratic Deficit working papers seriesDate posted: January 17, 2012 ; Last revised: January 18, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.782 seconds