Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1986921
 


 



Should We Have a Liberal Constitution?


Louis Michael Seidman


Georgetown University Law Center

December 1, 2011

Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 27, No. 3, p. 541, Winter 2011
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-005

Abstract:     
In this brief essay, I attempt to accomplish two things. In Part I, I defend my proposed constitution against its putative liberal critics. In Part II, I argue that given contingent but highly plausible empirical assumptions, the differences between my constitution and a liberal constitution are less dramatic than one might suppose. There are often sound, nonliberal grounds for supporting institutional arrangements that appear liberal. It turns out, then, that liberalism is both less attractive (Part I) and less necessary (Part II) than its defenders suppose.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: constitution, liberal, critical theory, critical legal studies

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 18, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Seidman, Louis Michael, Should We Have a Liberal Constitution? (December 1, 2011). Constitutional Commentary, Vol. 27, No. 3, p. 541, Winter 2011; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1986921

Contact Information

Louis Michael Seidman (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
Washington, DC 20057
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 730
Downloads: 153
Download Rank: 113,570

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds