Footnotes (30)



Contracts Meet Henry Ford

Barak D. Richman

Duke University - School of Law

Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 77, 2011

Legal scholars and legal educators view contracts as a welfare-maximizing (or optimal risk-allocating) device for two or more parties. Because we cling to this principal-driven paradigm, we think of lawyers only as the proverbial “transaction cost engineers,” the loyal agents of parties to a transaction. And whenever we observe contracts that appear to be suboptimal, we blame agency costs.

We instead should apply the literature on organizational economics to understand the production of contracts by the modern law firm. This literature better illustrates how law firms organize, why they produce the products they do, and why those products sometimes exhibit strangely inefficient features. These inefficiencies are not the consequence of agency costs or a lack of attorneys’ fidelity to their clients; they instead illustrate the limits — and, indirectly, the strengths — of large organizations. Indeed, observing that legal products do not perfectly match contemporary needs might be no less provocative than observing that Detroit is long overdue to produce high-mileage cars.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 23, 2012 ; Last revised: December 28, 2014

Suggested Citation

Richman, Barak D., Contracts Meet Henry Ford. Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 77, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1988991 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1988991

Contact Information

Barak D. Richman (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7244 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 393
Downloads: 68
Download Rank: 230,873
Footnotes:  30

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds