Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1989907
 
 

Footnotes (27)



 


 



Response Essay: Some Observations on Professor Schwartz's 'Foundation' Theory of Evidence


Paul F. Rothstein


Georgetown University Law Center

January 22, 2012

Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-008
Georgetown Law Journal Online, Vol. 100, 2012

Abstract:     
Professor David Schwartz's A Foundation Theory of Evidence posits an intriguing new way to look at Evidence. It asserts that offered evidence must meet a tripartite requirement before it can be relevant. The tripartite requirement is that the evidence must be "case-specific, assertive, and probably true." His shorthand for the tripartite requirement is that evidence must be "well founded." Hence, he calls his theory the "foundation theory of evidence" and claims this foundation notion is so central to evidence law that it eclipses in importance even relevance itself. The tripartite requirement inheres in the very concept of evidence and relevancy, he says, and although there are only a few evidentiary areas where the Federal Rules of Evidence and their state progeny specifically require something analogous to this requirement, he finds the requirement almost universally applied in trials across the country by judges' rulings (going by a variety of other names) and in decisions by parties about what evidence to offer as a practical matter.

This response essay addresses two of Schwartz's most intriguing and central contentions: (1) that almost all evidence must be "case-specific," "assertive," and "probably true"; and (2) that scholars who say there is no such thing as conditional relevance - that it is an incoherent concept - are wrong: conditional relevance exists and is widespread. The two are linked in Professor Schwartz's view because it is the tripartite requirement in (1) that often make evidence "conditionally relevant" as asserted in (2) - that is, irrelevant unless something is shown to establish that it complies with the elements of the tripartite requirement.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Evidence, Criminal Law, David Schwartz

JEL Classification: K14, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 23, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Rothstein, Paul F., Response Essay: Some Observations on Professor Schwartz's 'Foundation' Theory of Evidence (January 22, 2012). Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-008; Georgetown Law Journal Online, Vol. 100, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1989907

Contact Information

Paul F. Rothstein (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 377
Downloads: 82
Download Rank: 177,102
Footnotes:  27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds