Innovative Mechanisms for Resolving or Avoiding Inter-State Trade Disputes in an Asia-Pacific Regional Free Trade Agreement
Brett G. Williams
January 22, 2012
Australian International Law Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 141-154, 2011
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/04
This article elaborates upon ideas contributed to a symposium considering the possible shape of an Asia Pacific Community, including future trade arrangements within an Asia Pacific Community. It suggests some innovations in dispute settlement that could be considered for inclusion in such arrangements. The author suggests some innovative mechanisms by focussing on the way in which trade agreements and the dispute settlement mechanisms influence the internal political position of governments. The first mechanism would provide for a pre-quantification of the extent of retaliation that would be permitted should a complaint be successful. This mechanism would encourage respondent governments to focus earlier on weighing the potential loss of political support from exporters with any political support from import competing producers. The second mechanism would provide for free publication of an expert economic report on the economic welfare cost to the respondent of maintaining the protectionist measure subject to the complaint. This mechanism could increase the political weight attributed by the respondent government to the overall economic effects of the controversial measure. The paper further suggests that something similar to the second mechanism could be adopted as a separate transparency mechanism unrelated to dispute settlement. Such a mechanism might make it more likely that governments reform protectionist measures so as to avoiding the possibility of any legal dispute ever arising. An edited version of this paper is forthcoming in (2011) Australian International Law Journal (forthcoming February 2012).
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15
Keywords: Free Trade Agreements, World Trade Organization, Dispute Settlement Mechanisms, Dispute Settlement mechanisms in Trade Agreements. Trading Nations Dilemma model, Transparency Mechanisms for Trade Agreements
JEL Classification: K10, K30, K33
Date posted: January 23, 2012 ; Last revised: May 15, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.875 seconds