Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1991070
 
 

Footnotes (70)



 


 



Unitas via Diversitas: Can the Common European Sales Law Harmonize Through Diversity?


Gary Low


Singapore Management University - School of Law; Maastricht European Private Law Institute

January 24, 2012

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 1, 2012
Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2012/2

Abstract:     
Despite the fact that it is an optional instrument, the proposed Common European Sales Law (CESL) is based on Art 114 TFEU. This article considers whether the measure approximates the contract laws of Member States, such that the continued use of Art 114 TFEU is justifiable. One possibility, using the lens of regulatory competition, is to suggest that CESL is an intermediate step towards harmonisation. However, it is questionable whether regulatory competition will lead to the required degree of harmonisation, and whether CESL’s features demonstrate that is contributes within a wider context to that process of harmonisation. Another possibility is to distinguish CESL from other optional instruments on the basis that it is a second national regime. This is to say that since the regulation makes all second national contractual regimes the same, the contract laws of Member States are harmonised. The problem with this argument is that CESL leaves purely national contract laws unmolested.

Clearly, either justification for the use of Art 114 TFEU is plausible, just as they are open to debate. This is precisely the dilemma that must face the Commission if it is to defend its current choice of legal basis. If the issue is brought before the CJEU, CESL might end up as the Commission’s Tobacco Advertising III, forcing it to re-experience tremors of competence anxiety. On the other hand, if it risks litigation and obtains a favourable judgment, one can surmise the future of positive integration to be one of unitas via diversitas.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: European contract law, optional instrument, legal basis, harmonization

JEL Classification: D03, K12, K20

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 25, 2012 ; Last revised: May 1, 2012

Suggested Citation

Low, Gary, Unitas via Diversitas: Can the Common European Sales Law Harmonize Through Diversity? (January 24, 2012). Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 1, 2012; Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2012/2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1991070 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1991070

Contact Information

Gary Low (Contact Author)
Singapore Management University - School of Law ( email )
60, Stamford Road
Level 4
Singapore, 178900
Singapore
Maastricht European Private Law Institute ( email )
P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, 6200
Netherlands
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,966
Downloads: 931
Download Rank: 12,883
Footnotes:  70

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.437 seconds