Why do we Redistribute so Much but Tag so Little? Normative Diversity, Equal Sacri fice and Optimal Taxation
Harvard Business School - Business, Government and the International Economy Unit
August 23, 2012
Harvard Business School BGIE Unit Working Paper No. 12-064
The workhorse model of optimal taxation strongly recommends tagging, but its use in policy is limited. I argue that this puzzle is a symptom of a more fundamental problem. Conventional theory neglects the diverse normative criteria with which, as extensive evidence has shown, most people evaluate policy. In particular, if the classic principle of Equal Sacrifice augments the standard Utilitarian criterion, optimal tagging is limited. Calibrated simulations of optimal policy with normative diversity of this type simultaneously match three features of U.S. policy: substantial income redistribution; rejection of gender, race, and height tags; and acceptance of a blindness tag. Additional implications increase the appeal of this revision to conventional theory.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 39working papers series
Date posted: January 24, 2012 ; Last revised: August 25, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds