Plyler’s Legacy: Immigration and Higher Education in the 21st Century
Michael A. Olivas
University of Houston Law Center
Kristi L. Bowman
Michigan State University College of Law
Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2011, No. 2, p. 261, 2011
U of Houston Law Center No. 2012-A-4
The debate over whether or not the undocumented should be able to attend school and then enroll in college has become a more sustained controversy: should undocumented students be able to attend public colleges and universities and, if so, should they pay in-state rates? Because this issue is inescapably tied to a Supreme Court decision almost three decades old, Plyler v. Doe, we must first turn to the 1982 holding that undocumented schoolchildren can attend elementary and secondary public schools without regard to their immigration status. As scholars have pored over the many treatments of Plyler, it has become possible to see its kaleidoscopic nature and thus come to appreciate anew its significance.
This essay in an Introduction to the special issue of the Michigan State Law Review (Volume 2011, Issue no. 2) that contained several articles on the subject.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: Immigrant education, Residency requirements, Postsecondary education, College tuition, Undocumented immigrant students, Undocumented college studentsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 27, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.516 seconds