Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1992138
 
 

Footnotes (449)



 


 



Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties and Advice


Michael Hatfield


University of Washington - School of Law

2012

Florida Tax Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2012
Texas Tech Law School Research Paper

Abstract:     
Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties and Advice provides a timely historical review of legal ethics and federal taxes. Focusing on the first two decades of the modern income tax (1945-1965), the Article reviews the ethics literature of the tax bar, which was mostly written by very prominent tax lawyers (a founder of Paul, Weiss; partners at Sullivan & Cromwell, Willkie Farr, etc.), tax professors (including the dean at Harvard Law School), and government officials (including key advisors to FDR, JFK, and LBJ). This seemingly forgotten literature provides a remarkable contrast to today’s anti-tax climate, especially given that the highest marginal individual tax rate during 1945-1965 was 94%. The writers of this period emphasized the patriotic duty to support the federal government by paying taxes, describing taxes, for example, as the price to maintain capitalism (Merle Miller) and a “blessing” (Erwin Griswold). Several stressed the ethical duty of lawyers to improve their clients’ respect for the tax system (Norris Darrell, e.g.). “Ethics” for these writers was not an issue of the ABA canons but rather a more general, philosophical reflection. For example, in 1949, the tax committee of the ABA issued a report on the importance of natural law jurisprudence in tax. In 1952, the discussion at the Tax Law Review banquet (which was nominally dedicated to discussing “Ethical Problems of Tax Practitioners”) developed into a debate over whether or not Americans were more degenerate then than in the past (Edmond Cahn) or merely more self-conscious (Thomas Tarleau). But the ethics writers were also concerned with specific issues that endure to this day, such as when to disclose an arguable but uncertain tax position – some (Randolph Paul, e.g.) arguing almost any position the government was likely to question should be disclosed, others (Boris Bittker, e.g.) arguing against disclosure so long as the position was reasonable. There was wide disagreement as to whether or not tax lawyers owed a special duty to the system, but wide agreement that this theoretical debate was nearly moot given that conservative tax advice was usually not only the most ethical but the most practical. This pragmatic attitude – emphasizing that good tax practice, good tax ethics, and good tax advice tended to converge – reflected the “real world” orientation of these professionally accomplished writers, even though, by today’s standards, many of their statements seem idealistic. The salvaging of this forgotten literature is timely not only in its relevance to contemporary debates, but also its relevance to the increasing historical research of the income tax as its 100th anniversary approaches.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: legal ethics, federal income tax,\

JEL Classification: K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 27, 2012 ; Last revised: August 1, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hatfield, Michael, Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties and Advice (2012). Florida Tax Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2012; Texas Tech Law School Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1992138 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1992138

Contact Information

Michael W. Hatfield (Contact Author)
University of Washington - School of Law ( email )
William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States
206-221-1535 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.washington.edu/Directory/Profile.aspx?ID=725
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,054
Downloads: 158
Download Rank: 108,253
Footnotes:  449

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.343 seconds