Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1993027
 
 

References (35)



 


 



Evaluating Antitrust Leniency Programs


Joan-Ramon Borrell


University of Barcelona

Juan Luis Jimenez


University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Carmen Garcia


affiliation not provided to SSRN

October 30, 2012

XREAP No. 2012-01

Abstract:     
This paper identifies and then quantifies econometrically the impact of leniency programs on the perception of the effectiveness of antitrust policies in the business community using panel data for as much as 59 countries and 14-year span. We use the dynamics of the gradual diffusion of leniency programs across countries and over time to evaluate the impact of the program, taking care of the bias caused by self-selection into the program. We find that leniency programs increase the perception of effectiveness by an order of magnitude ranging from 10% to 21%. Leniency programs have become weapons of mass dissuasion in the hands of antitrust enforcers against the more damaging forms of explicit collusion among rival firms in the market place.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: Antitrust, Leniency Programs, Policy effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Political economy

JEL Classification: D7, K2, L4, O4

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 30, 2012 ; Last revised: November 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Borrell, Joan-Ramon and Jimenez, Juan Luis and Garcia, Carmen, Evaluating Antitrust Leniency Programs (October 30, 2012). XREAP No. 2012-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1993027 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1993027

Contact Information

Joan-Ramon Borrell Arqué (Contact Author)
University of Barcelona ( email )
Av. Diagonal, 690
Barcelona, 08034
Spain
Juan Luis Jimenez
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria ( email )
C/Juan de Quesada, No. 30
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas 35017
Spain
Carmen Garcia
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 706
Downloads: 165
Download Rank: 101,095
References:  35

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.953 seconds