Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1994462
 


 



My Encounter with Canned Briefs


Norman Otto Stockmeyer


Thomas M. Cooley Law School


The Pillar (Thomas M. Cooley Law School) May, 2012, p. 5

Abstract:     
Briefing cases is an integral part of the learning process in the first year of law school. Despite the near-universal advice of law professors and law school guides to “brief the cases yourself,” students may be tempted to rely on commercial “canned” briefs instead.

This author’s accidental encounter with canned briefs while preparing for a Contracts class reinforced his opinion that his law school bookstore was right to ban canned briefs. No only do they impair the learning process, they are unreliable and can cause misunderstandings. They also have the potential to embarrass students who rely on them when reciting in class. Students who want to maximize their success should shun canned briefs.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 1

Keywords: legal education, briefing cases, law school success, contract law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 30, 2012 ; Last revised: January 1, 2013

Suggested Citation

Stockmeyer, Norman Otto, My Encounter with Canned Briefs. The Pillar (Thomas M. Cooley Law School) May, 2012, p. 5. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1994462 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1994462

Contact Information

Norman Otto Stockmeyer (Contact Author)
Thomas M. Cooley Law School ( email )
300 S. Capitol Avenue
P.O. Box 13038
Lansing, MI 48901
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.cooley.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 420
Downloads: 74
Download Rank: 183,018

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds