Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1996017
 
 

Footnotes (140)



 


 



Re: Defining Securitization


Jonathan C. Lipson


Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

March 12, 2013

85 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1229 (2012)
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-05

Abstract:     
This Article fills a gap in commercial finance law. Despite the fact that “securitization” has become enormously important to capital markets — and is sometimes blamed for the credit crisis — we have no agreed understanding of the term. Various regulators and commentators have generated a wide range of definitions, but many are vague or omit crucial elements. Perhaps most surprising, the Dodd-Frank financial services reform — the most aggressive attempt yet to regulate securitization — does not define it at all. How can we regulate something without a shared conception of what it is?

This Article assesses data on the performance and function of securitizations to develop a normative definition of the term based on its essential elements (its inputs, structure, and outputs) and its legitimate social and economic functions, namely providing a more effective means of connecting buyers and sellers of capital than traditional methods of financing, such as bank lending or issuing shares of stock.

The definition offered here distinguishes “true” securitizations from other transactions, such as collateralized debt obligations and Enron’s structured financings, which may satisfy current legal definitions of a securitization, but which in fact lack one or more essential elements, and which therefore fail to perform the important social and economic functions captured by the normative definition advanced here.

The Article concludes by summarizing the benefits of a better definition of securitization.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: securitization, structured finance, commercial finance, credit crisis, Dodd-Frank, credit

JEL Classification: G10, G33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2012 ; Last revised: May 23, 2013

Suggested Citation

Lipson, Jonathan C., Re: Defining Securitization (March 12, 2013). 85 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1229 (2012); Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-05. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1996017

Contact Information

Jonathan C. Lipson (Contact Author)
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )
1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,075
Downloads: 395
Download Rank: 40,880
Footnotes:  140

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.329 seconds