Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1996581
 
 

Footnotes (241)



 


 



Privacy and the Right of Free Expression


John A. Humbach


Pace University School of Law

January 4, 2013

First Amendment Law Review, Vol. 11, p. 16, 2012

Abstract:     
Nobody likes to be talked about but everybody likes to talk. Trying to stop the dissemination of private information is, however, an impingement on free expression and the freedom to observe. A freestanding "right of privacy" that violates these interests is constitutionally permissible only if it can be justified using one of the standard bases for allowing restrictions on First Amendment rights. The three most likely possibilities are that the law in question: (1) can pass strict scrutiny, (2) falls within a recognized "categorical" exception, or (3) has only an "incidental" burden on First Amendment interests. Of these three, only the last would seem to support a broad protection for privacy in the face of First Amendment challenge and, indeed, such protection has long been provided under the ordinary law of property. The exclusivity provided by ordinary property rights has long protected privacy in the places where most people spend most of their time, viz. privately owned spaces, and with respect to the objects that hold our personal information, including papers, digital equipment and other such privately-owned chattels.

To the extent that privacy interests can be protected through ordinary property law (as most can), they should not encounter the serious constitutional objections that can be raised against laws that directly impinge on First Amendment interests. Any burdens on First Amendment interests imposed by property laws would qualify as merely "incidental” burdens, since the law of property (unlike many "privacy" laws) does not exist for the very purpose of limiting First Amendment interests such as the interest in free dissemination of truthful information. By contrast, rights of privacy that are divorced from property rights typically are meant to operate as direct impingements on the exercise of First Amendment rights and they are, therefore, of dubious constitutional validity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: First Amendment, Privacy, Freedom of Expression, Right to Observe, Right to Record, Right of Privacy, Property and Privacy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2012 ; Last revised: February 3, 2013

Suggested Citation

Humbach, John A., Privacy and the Right of Free Expression (January 4, 2013). First Amendment Law Review, Vol. 11, p. 16, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1996581 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1996581

Contact Information

John A. Humbach (Contact Author)
Pace University School of Law ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
(914) 422-4239 (Phone)
(914) 422-4015 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.pace.edu/jhumbach/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 585
Downloads: 98
Download Rank: 160,562
Footnotes:  241

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.421 seconds