Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1997820
 


 



What (Can) (Should) (Must) Defense Counsel Withhold from The Prosecution in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Proceedings?


David M. Siegel


New England Law | Boston

February 1, 2012

The Champion, Vol. 18, No. 35, December 2011

Abstract:     
In July 2010 the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility issued an opinion that any criminal defense lawyer facing or bringing a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC), or any prosecutor defending one, should read. Formal Opinion 10-456, 'Disclosure of Information to Prosecutor When Lawyer’s Former Client Brings Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim,' answers the question implicit in its title, in short: Unless by express waiver of the former client after informed consent, no more than necessary to respond to the specific allegations, and then only in a formal proceeding that provides for judicial supervision. The opinion explains that voluntary disclosures outside formal proceedings are impermissible, and that the self-defense exception to the obligation to maintain confidentiality has very limited application in the post-conviction context. Critics have questioned the Opinion’s narrow interpretation of the self-defense exception, its claims that prosecutors face little prejudice from inability to receive information from defense counsel before a proceeding, and its assertion that defense lawyers have little justifiable need to make such advance disclosures. This short article outlines the opinion, describes developing jurisprudence concerning defense counsel’s cooperation with the prosecutor, and sets forth suggested practices for counsel facing allegations of IAC.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: confidentiality, ethics, post-conviction, counsel, defense, prosecution

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 3, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Siegel, David M., What (Can) (Should) (Must) Defense Counsel Withhold from The Prosecution in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Proceedings? (February 1, 2012). The Champion, Vol. 18, No. 35, December 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1997820

Contact Information

David M. Siegel (Contact Author)
New England Law | Boston ( email )
154 Stuart St.
Boston, 02116
United States
(617) 422-7270 (Phone)
(617) 422-7453 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.nesl.edu/clsr/

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 509
Downloads: 108
Download Rank: 143,069

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds