On a New Approach to Social Evaluations of Environmental Projects
Stockholm School of Economics
February 3, 2012
CERE Working Paper, 2012:4
Conventional cost-benefit rules typically assume that the alternative to the project under evaluation is 'doing nothing' or 'business as usual'. In this note we contrast this approach to one where the alternative is to provide another environmental good or service. We show that this approach, which draw on methods like Habitat Equivalency Analysis and Resource Equivalency Analysis, imply that all cost and benefit items can be estimated using market prices. This is in sharp contrast to the conventional approach which typically require the use of controversial stated preference techniques to estimate the willingness to pay for non-market goods.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: cost-benefit analysis, habitat equivalency analysis, non-market goods, resource equivalency analysis, stated preference methods
JEL Classification: D61, H43, Q51, Q57working papers series
Date posted: February 5, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds