'To Corral and Control': Stop, Frisk, and the Geography of Freedom
Saint Louis University - School of Law
September 23, 2013
University of Richmond Law Review, Forthcoming May 2014
Saint Louis U. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-05
This article revisits the emergence of stop and frisk law in the 1960s to make three points. One, the impetus for formalizing police stops arose midst confusion generated by Mapp v. Ohio, the landmark Warren Court opinion incorporating the exclusionary rule to the states. Two, police over-reactions to Mapp intersected with fears of urban riots, leading to a formalization of stop and frisk rules that aimed at better containing inner-city minority populations. Three, the heightened control of urban streets coupled with the heightened protection of the private home bore geographic implications, interiorizing liberty in ways that perpetuated a national narrative of expanding freedoms even as it contributed to black incarceration.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: criminal procedure, race, rights, Warren Court, riots, protest, demonstration, Epton, Mapp v. Ohio
Date posted: February 6, 2012 ; Last revised: October 26, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.344 seconds