George Mason University - School of Law, Alumni
February 7, 2012
Journal of Law, Vol. 2, (Journal of Legal Metrics, Vol. 1), No. 1, 2012
With this brief essay, we offer an improved metric of appellate review – one which measures circuit court performance by compiling data on the Court’s resolution of circuit splits. A “circuit split,”as articulated by Supreme Court Rule 10, exists when “a federal court of appeals has decided a case in conflict with the decision of another federal court of appeals.” Thus, rather than simply calculating how frequently the Court affirms the judgment below (what we term the “primary review” affirmance rate), we examine how frequently the Court approves of a court of appeals’ judgment onthe particular issue that has caused the split. We term our metricthe “parallel review” affirmance rate, as the Court is evaluating not only the particular decision on which the writ of certiorari was issued, but also the parallel, conflicting decisions on the issue that are evaluated by the Court in resolving the circuit split.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: Supreme Court, United States Courts of Appeal, Legal Metrics, Circuit SplitAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 10, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.531 seconds