Abstract

 


 



Appellate Review


Tom Cummins


Independent

Adam Aft


George Mason University - School of Law, Alumni

February 7, 2012

Journal of Law, Vol. 2, (Journal of Legal Metrics, Vol. 1), No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
With this brief essay, we offer an improved metric of appellate review – one which measures circuit court performance by compiling data on the Court’s resolution of circuit splits. A “circuit split,”as articulated by Supreme Court Rule 10, exists when “a federal court of appeals has decided a case in conflict with the decision of another federal court of appeals.” Thus, rather than simply calculating how frequently the Court affirms the judgment below (what we term the “primary review” affirmance rate), we examine how frequently the Court approves of a court of appeals’ judgment onthe particular issue that has caused the split. We term our metricthe “parallel review” affirmance rate, as the Court is evaluating not only the particular decision on which the writ of certiorari was issued, but also the parallel, conflicting decisions on the issue that are evaluated by the Court in resolving the circuit split.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Supreme Court, United States Courts of Appeal, Legal Metrics, Circuit Split

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 10, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Cummins, Tom and Aft, Adam, Appellate Review (February 7, 2012). Journal of Law, Vol. 2, (Journal of Legal Metrics, Vol. 1), No. 1, 2012 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2001093

Contact Information

Tom Cummins
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
Adam Aft (Contact Author)
George Mason University - School of Law, Alumni ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 610
Downloads: 60
Download Rank: 185,641

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.797 seconds