Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2002093
 


 



Actual Versus Perceived Performance of Judges


Theodore Eisenberg


Cornell University - Law School

Talia Fisher


Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law; Harvard Law School; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics

Issachar Rosen-Zvi


Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law

February 1, 2012

Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-23

Abstract:     
Claims of judicial bias are easy to make, but studies supporting such claims often use flawed methodology. Claims may be based on incomplete samples of a judge’s work or fail to account for the case assignment process’ influence on the merits of the judges’ cases. This Article explores the relation between perceptions of bias and the underlying reality of judicial behavior. It reports the results of a survey of the Israeli legal community’s perceptions of Israel Supreme Court justices’ preferences in criminal cases and compares the survey results with justices’ actual votes in two years of criminal cases. Justices’ actual voting patterns in mandatory jurisdiction criminal cases are not correlated with pro-state or pro-defendant perceptions of them. Justices’ votes in the much smaller pool of discretionary jurisdiction cases are more consistent with perceptions of justices’ positions than are their votes in mandatory cases.

Media reports of justices as pro-state or pro-defendant also correlate reasonably well with perceptions of justices. Perceptions of justices’ tendencies vary significantly across subgroups of the legal community with some evidence suggesting that both state and defense attorneys tend to view justices as hostile to their clients’ positions. Our findings suggest that a legal community’s perceptions of highly visible judges on a country’s highest court, can substantially differ from judges’ actual behavior in the mass of cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Courts, Judges, Case Selection, Perceptions

JEL Classification: K4, K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 9, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Eisenberg, Theodore and Fisher, Talia and Rosen-Zvi, Issachar, Actual Versus Perceived Performance of Judges (February 1, 2012). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-23. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2002093 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2002093

Contact Information

Theodore Eisenberg (Contact Author)
Cornell University - Law School ( email )
524 College Ave
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-6477 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)
Talia Fisher
Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978, IL
Israel
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics ( email )
124 Mount Auburn Street
Suite 520N
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Issachar Rosen-zvi
Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978, IL
Israel
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.tau.ac.il/Eng/?CategoryID=242&ArticleID=202
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 497
Downloads: 71
Download Rank: 187,355

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.610 seconds