Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2002757
 
 

Footnotes (234)



 


 



Reverse Engineering Informational Privacy Law


Michael Birnhack


Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law

February 10, 2012

15 Yale J. L. & Tech. 24 (2012)

Abstract:     
Is technology-neutral legislation possible? Technological neutrality in legislation is often praised for its flexibility and ability to apply to future technologies. Yet, time and again we realize that even if the law did not name any technology, it was nevertheless based on an image of a particular technology. When new technologies appear, they expose the underlying technological mindset of the existing law. This article suggests that we read technology-related laws so to uncover their hidden technological mindset so that we can better understand the law and prepare for the future. Reverse Engineering the law is an interpretive mode, tailored to uncover the technological layer of the law.

After locating the discussion within the paradigm of law & technology, I unpack the meaning of technology-neutral legislation: I point to three possible justifications thereof: flexibility, innovation and harmonization. The article then suggests an initial typology that offers a range of legislative choices, richer rather than a binary all-or-nothing choice, and explains the methodology of reverse engineering the law.

The next step is to challenge the claim for neutrality in the context of informational privacy. Proposals to amend the law are on the tables of policy-makers in the United States and in the EU. I focus on the current global engine of data protection law, the EU 1995 Data Protection Directive. The reverse engineering of the Directive indicates that it is more technological-neutral than we might have expected from an instrument that was composed in the early 1990s based on laws from the early 1970s. Nevertheless, the close reading reveals the underlying technological mindset and assumptions. I conclude that pure technologically neutral legislation is, to a great extent, a myth.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Keywords: privacy, information, technology, data protection, EU Directive, FTC, Privacy by Design, right to be forgotten

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 10, 2012 ; Last revised: March 13, 2014

Suggested Citation

Birnhack, Michael, Reverse Engineering Informational Privacy Law (February 10, 2012). 15 Yale J. L. & Tech. 24 (2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2002757 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2002757

Contact Information

Michael D. Birnhack (Contact Author)
Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978, IL
Israel
+972-3-640-6623 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,483
Downloads: 331
Download Rank: 52,832
Footnotes:  234

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.406 seconds