Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2003004
 


 



Contracts, Courts, and the Construction of Consent


Thomas Wuil Joo


University of California - Davis Law School

February 10, 2012

COMMERCIAL CONTRACT LAW: A TRANSATLANTIC PERSPECTIVE, DiMatteo, Rowley, Saintier, Zhou, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2012

Abstract:     
Contract law sometimes acknowledges that the legal construct of “objective consent” is distinct from actual subjective consent. But contract law also labors to obscure this distinction and conflate the two concepts — indeed, the very term “objective consent” performs this function. Economic analysis of law sometimes engages in a similar conflation by treating the efficiency of an arrangement — as determined by a theorist or judge — as a perfect proxy for subjective consent to that arrangement.

Basing contractual obligations on judicial assessments of outward phenomena means contract law depends at least in part on judges’ subjective notions of policy and fairness. Conflating this court-centered process with subjective consent is descriptively inaccurate. It is also faulty normative reasoning, as it invokes simple libertarian rhetoric to justify a more complex, statist process. The conflation problem is especially relevant with respect to form contracts, which fit uneasily with traditional notions of subjective consent. Courts and theorists should avoid the easy invocation of “consent” as the basis of contract law and instead be more specific in disclosing — and defending — the normative assumptions behind their prescriptions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: contracts, consent, assent, objective theory of contract, form contracts, contracts of adhesion, rhetoric, courts, judiciary

JEL Classification: K00, K12

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 13, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Joo, Thomas Wuil, Contracts, Courts, and the Construction of Consent (February 10, 2012). COMMERCIAL CONTRACT LAW: A TRANSATLANTIC PERSPECTIVE, DiMatteo, Rowley, Saintier, Zhou, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2003004

Contact Information

Thomas Wuil Joo (Contact Author)
University of California - Davis Law School ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
400 Mrak Hall Dr.
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
(530) 754-6089 (Phone)
(530) 752-4704 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 524
Downloads: 84
Download Rank: 182,463

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.562 seconds