Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2004420
 


 



Constitutional Backdrops


Stephen E. Sachs


Duke University School of Law

January 15, 2012

George Washington Law Review, Vol. 80, p. 1813, 2012

Abstract:     
The Constitution is often said to leave important questions unanswered. These include, for example, the existence of a congressional contempt power or an executive removal power, the role of stare decisis, and the scope of state sovereign immunity. Bereft of clear text, many scholars have sought answers to such questions in Founding-era history. But why should the historical answers be valid today, if they were never codified in the Constitution's text?

This Article describes a category of legal rules that weren't adopted in the text, expressly or implicitly, but which nonetheless have continuing legal force under the written Constitution. These are constitutional "backdrops": rules of law that aren't derivable from the text, but are left unaltered by the text, and are in fact protected by the text from various kinds of legal change. These rules may have been incorporated by reference; they may have been insulated from change by the usual political actors; or they may have been preserved as "defeaters" for the Constitution's defeasible language. In each case, the text requires that the rules be given force, even though it doesn't supply their content.

Backdrops are not only a legitimate category of legal rules, but a surprisingly important part of our legal system. Moreover, recognizing backdrops as a category may help shed light on otherwise insoluble disputes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 76

Keywords: Constitutional Backdrops, common law, incorporation by reference, defeasible, defeasibility, contempt of congress, executive power, removal, state borders, sovereign immunity, stare decisis

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K4, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 27, 2012 ; Last revised: December 3, 2012

Suggested Citation

Sachs, Stephen E., Constitutional Backdrops (January 15, 2012). George Washington Law Review, Vol. 80, p. 1813, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2004420

Contact Information

Stephen E. Sachs (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-8542 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,344
Downloads: 396
Download Rank: 41,183

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds