Equity-Holding Institutional Lenders: Do They Receive Better Terms?
University of Missouri at Columbia
Bernadette A. Minton
Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Finance
Michael S. Weisbach
Ohio State University (OSU) - Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
February 13, 2012
Charles A. Dice Working Paper No. 2012-03-005
Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2012-5
The past decade has seen significant changes in the structure of the corporate lending market, with non-commercial bank institutional investors playing larger roles than they historically have played. In addition, non-commercial bank institutional lenders are often equity holders in their borrowing firms. In our sample of 11,137 tranches of institutional “leveraged” loans, 2,008 (18%) have a non-commercial bank institution that also owns at least 0.1% of the firm's equity. Such “dual holder” loan tranches have higher spreads than otherwise similar loan tranches without equity holder participation. The dual holder premium is present for both revolver and term loans, and exists within all non-investment grade credit rating classes. Contrary to risk-based explanations of this finding, dual holder tranches are priced with premiums relative to other tranches of the same loan package. Dual holding premiums are higher when the equity-holder's stake is larger, when the dual-holder's share in the loan is larger, and when the equity holder is a hedge fund or a private equity fund. These premiums likely represent additional compensation to dual holders for providing capital to firms when the firms are having difficulty raising capital otherwise.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52
Keywords: loan tranche, institutional investors, lending by equity holders
JEL Classification: G3, G32, G21working papers series
Date posted: February 14, 2012 ; Last revised: February 26, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.563 seconds