Inside Debt and Debt Incentives: Evidence from the 2008 Financial Crisis
Joseph Taylor Halford
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
City University of New York, CUNY Baruch College, Zicklin School of Business
March 15, 2012
We study the rationale for firms’ use of inside debt by exploiting the relation between firms’ default risk and inside debt (pension and deferred compensation). The classical principal-agent theory indicates that the agency costs of debt are higher when the firm’s debt is riskier. We test whether firms that are likely to face more severe agency problems of debt provide more debt incentives. We provide evidence that less distressed firms use more inside debt. The 2008 financial crisis significantly increases firms’ default risk. This exogenous shift in firms’ default risk offers an opportunity to provide evidence on the potential causal relation between default risk and inside debt. Based on a difference-in-differences approach, we find that firms with increased default risk during the crisis period increase their inside debt significantly less than those firms with decreased default risk. Overall, we find little evidence to support the hypothesis that inside debt is used to alleviate the agency costs of debt. Anecdotal evidence suggests that personal tax concerns appear to be an important determinant for inside debt usage.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: Inside debt, Compensation, Financial crisis, Debt incentives, Equity incentives
JEL Classification: G34, G38, M52working papers series
Date posted: February 15, 2012 ; Last revised: April 9, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.672 seconds