Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2005970
 
 

Footnotes (247)



 


 



You Can't Go Holmes Again


Lumen N. Mulligan


University of Kansas Law School

February 15, 2012

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 107, 2012

Abstract:     
Under the standard interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the so called Holmes test, pleading a federal cause of action is sufficient for finding federal question jurisdiction. In January 2012, the Supreme Court, in Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC, recharacterized this standard test for § 1331 jurisdiction as one that considers whether “federal law creates [both] a private right of action and furnishes the substantive rules of decision.” In this first piece to address the Mims Court’s significant change to the § 1331 canon, I applaud its rights-inclusive holding. I contend that this rights-inclusive view rests upon a firmer jurisprudential framework than does the Holmes test, as the latter is intertwined with an anachronistic pairing of causes of action and rights with Justice Holmes’s overall “bad man” approach to the law. I argue further that Mims’s rights-inclusive approach more accurately describes § 1331 doctrine as a whole, helping to illuminate that — contrary to the Holmes test — merely pleading a federal cause of action is neither necessary nor sufficient for taking statutory federal question jurisdiction. I also demonstrate that this rights-inclusive view is more solicitous of the intent of the 1875 Congress, which passed § 1331, and of the intentions of later-in-time Congresses, which passed legislation against the presumption that federal rights provide grounds for taking federal question jurisdiction, than is the Holmes test.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: federal question jurisdiction, 28 USC 1331, Holmes test, congressional intent, cause of action, right

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 17, 2012 ; Last revised: December 3, 2012

Suggested Citation

Mulligan, Lumen N., You Can't Go Holmes Again (February 15, 2012). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 107, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2005970 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005970

Contact Information

Lumen N. Mulligan (Contact Author)
University of Kansas Law School ( email )
Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States
785-864-9219 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 539
Downloads: 129
Download Rank: 128,658
Footnotes:  247

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds