Samantar v. Yousuf: U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Brief on Behalf of Holocaust Survivors and Darfur Genocide Groups
Gregory S. Gordon
University of North Dakota - School of Law
Sonya D. Winner
affiliation not provided to SSRN
February 15, 2012
In the case of Samantar v. Yousuf, the United States Supreme Court had to decide whether a former Somali Prime Minister, accused of torturing his own people while in office, should be immune from liability in U.S. courts on grounds of sovereign immunity (in particular, pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act). The sovereign immunity defense featured prominently in cases brought against former Nazi officials in the wake of the Holocaust, including the landmark Nuremberg and Eichmann trials. Modern international criminal tribunals have also relied on this precedent to reject the sovereign immunity defense for gross human rights violations committed in Rwanda, Darfur and the former Yugoslavia. This amicus brief illuminates the connection between the defense as asserted in the Samantar case and its treatment and rejection in the Holocaust and modern cases.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43
Keywords: sovereign Immunity defense, atrocities, Holocaust, international criminal law, alien tort statuteworking papers series
Date posted: February 18, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.484 seconds