Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2007098
 
 

Footnotes (175)



 


 



Diverging EU and WTO Perspectives on Extraterritorial Process Regulation


Laurens Ankersmit


VU University Amsterdam - Faculty of Law

Jessica C. Lawrence


VU University Amsterdam - Faculty of Law

Gareth T. Davies


Free University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Law

February 17, 2012

Minnesota Journal of International Law Online, Spring 2012

Abstract:     
This paper looks at the relevant case law from the EU and WTO bodies concerning extraterritorial process regulation - PPMs. We note that while both bodies have an emergent and incomplete jurisprudence in this area, there are differences of approach and sometimes of principle in how they view PPM measures and what may be called 'extraterritoriality'. The EU, with a somewhat wider global and internal mission, and a self-perception of deeper and wider legitimacy, is relaxed, even enthusiastic about the use of trade to leverage social and environmental change. This fits with its basic legal documents, and consistent stated policy approach, which is that economic policy must always take account of its non-economic context. The WTO, by contrast, while not dismissive in principle of PPM measures, displays a greater caution, entirely in tune with the widespread suspicion of PPMs in the international trade law community and the logical prioritising of free trade within the WTO context.

These divergences in attitude, this paper argues, have the potential to lead to hard conflict between the world's largest trading jurisdiction and the global trade regulator. That suggestion is brought into sharp relief by the recent ATAA case at the ECJ, in which the Court of Justice dismissed out of hand claims that the EU's emissions trading practices were extraterritorial when applied to airlines. The relevant parts of the judgment are considered in detail in the paper.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 67

Keywords: EU law, WTO, PPM, extraterritoriality, trade and environment, international trade

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 18, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Ankersmit, Laurens and Lawrence, Jessica C. and Davies, Gareth T., Diverging EU and WTO Perspectives on Extraterritorial Process Regulation (February 17, 2012). Minnesota Journal of International Law Online, Spring 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2007098

Contact Information

Laurens Ankersmit
VU University Amsterdam - Faculty of Law ( email )
De Boelelaan 1105
1081 HV Amsterdam
Netherlands
Jessica C. Lawrence
VU University Amsterdam - Faculty of Law ( email )
De Boelelaan 1105
1081 HV Amsterdam
Netherlands
Gareth T. Davies (Contact Author)
Free University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Law ( email )
De Boelelaan 1105
1081 HV Amsterdam
Netherlands
+31 20 5986303 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,062
Downloads: 221
Download Rank: 80,709
Footnotes:  175

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds