Abstract

 
 

Citations



 


 



Bismarck versus Beveridge: Which Unemployment Compensation System Is More Prone to Labor Market Shocks?


Thomas Beissinger


University of Hohenheim; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Oliver Büsse


Universität Regensburg

2001

Finanzarchiv, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 78-102, 2001

Abstract:     
Based on a model with imperfectly competitive labor and product markets the real consequences of labor market shocks for economies with either an earnings-related or flat-rate unemployment compensation system are considered. A distinctive feature of the analysis is the comparison of both unemployment compensation systems in a two-country setting. It is demonstrated that the performance of a system with earnings-related or flat-rate unemployment benefits depends on whether the labor market shock is provoked in the home country or originates from abroad. We also point out how our results extend to two-tier unemployment compensation systems which differ with respect to the relative importance of earnings-related and flat-rate benefits.

JEL Classification: E24, F41, J23, J51, J65

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: February 18, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Beissinger, Thomas and Büsse, Oliver, Bismarck versus Beveridge: Which Unemployment Compensation System Is More Prone to Labor Market Shocks? (2001). Finanzarchiv, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 78-102, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2007220

Contact Information

Thomas Beissinger (Contact Author)
University of Hohenheim ( email )
Schloss Museumsflügel
Stuttgart, 70593
Germany
HOME PAGE: http://labour.uni-hohenheim.de/
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany
Oliver Büsse
Universität Regensburg ( email )
D-93040 Regensburg
Germany
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 131

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.312 seconds