Abstract

 
 

References (34)



 


 



Chinese Investment in Latin American Resources: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly


Theodore Moran


Georgetown University; Center for Global Development

Barbara R. Kotschwar


Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics; Georgetown University

Julia Muir


Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics

February 17, 2012

Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper No. 12-3

Abstract:     
China's need for vast amounts of minerals to sustain its high economic growth rate has led Chinese investors to acquire stakes in natural resource companies, extend loans to mining and petroleum investors, and write long-term procurement contracts for oil and minerals in Africa, Latin America, Australia, Canada, and other resource-rich regions. These efforts to procure raw materials might be exacerbating the problems of strong demand; "locking up" natural resource supplies, gaining preferential access to available output, and extending control over the world's extractive industries. But Chinese investment need not have a zero-sum effect if Chinese procurement arrangements expand, diversify, and make more competitive the global supplier system. Previous Peterson Institute research (see Moran 2010) and new research undertaken in this paper, show that the majority of Chinese investments and procurement arrangements serve to help diversify and make more competitive the portion of the world natural resource base located in Latin America. For a more comprehensive analysis, we conduct a structured comparison of four Peruvian mines with foreign ownership: two Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development-based, and two Chinese. We examine what conditions or policy measures are most effective in inducing Chinese investors to adopt international industry standards and best-practices, and which are not. We distill from this case study some lessons for other countries in Latin America, Africa, and elsewhere that intend to use Chinese investment to develop their extractive sectors: first, that financial markets bring accountability; second, that the host country regulatory environment makes a significant difference; and third, that foreign investment is a catalyst for change.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Chinese foreign direct investment, foreign direct investment (FDI), natural resources, Peru, environmental impact, corporate social responsibility

JEL Classification: F14, F16, F21, F22, F59, O16, O54, Q31, Q32, Q34, Q37, Q38

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 27, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Moran, Theodore, Kotschwar, Barbara R. and Muir, Julia, Chinese Investment in Latin American Resources: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (February 17, 2012). Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper No. 12-3. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2007277 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007277

Contact Information

Theodore Moran
Georgetown University ( email )
Washington, DC 20057
United States
Center for Global Development
1800 Massachusetts Ave NW
Third Floor
Washington, DC 20036
United States
Barbara R. Kotschwar (Contact Author)
Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics ( email )
1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
United States
Georgetown University ( email )
Washington, DC 20057
United States
Julia Muir
Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics ( email )
1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 558
Downloads: 135
Download Rank: 107,162
References:  34

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.407 seconds