Reversing: Undoing Bad Laws and Bad Judicial Decisions
F. H. Buckley
George Mason University School of Law
February 20, 2012
THE AMERICAN ILLNESS: ESSAYS ON THE RULE OF LAW, Yale University Press, Forthcoming
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 12-18
The growth of laws and judicial decisions of questionable economic benefit, and the current debt crisis, pose the question of how bad choices can be reversed. That problem is prominently on display in southern Europe, and indeed throughout much of the first world. Parliamentary systems seem better able to undo bad laws than the U.S. presidential system, with its separation of powers, which does not augur well for America. Bad judicial decisions might be even harder to reverse, because of the conservatism of judges who follow precedent. However, judicial elections in the states appear to offer a solution to the problem. The objections which have been raised against such elections seem less than compelling.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: American Revolution, Canada, comparative, confederation, constitutional, Disraeli, framers, Gladstone, governance, Great Britain, legislative reform, Loyalists, merit selection, monarchical, populist, pre-enactment screening, presidential, Reform Act, Republican, reversibility, Walter Bagehot
JEL Classification: D72, H11, H77Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 20, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds