Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2008463
 


 



Battling Collateral Consequences: The Long Road to Redemption


Joann M. Sahl


University of Akron School of Law

February 20, 2012

Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2013
U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-01

Abstract:     
Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour issued 193 controversial pardons on January 10, 2012, his last day in office. Former Ohio Governor Ted Strickland, who left office in January 2011, also faced criticism when he granted 280 pardons. Both governors publicly acknowledged that they granted most of their pardons to rehabilitated ex-offenders who sought to overcome the civil consequences of their criminal convictions. These consequences, known as collateral consequences, impede the ability of millions of ex-offenders to find employment, housing or other important benefits.

This Article explores the increasingly important, but controversial, role that governors play in the battleground of collateral consequences. Their use of their redemptive pardon power has become critical to ex-offenders to overcome the collateral consequences of their convictions so they may reintegrate into society. This Article examines the redemptive pardon process through the lens of two ex-offenders who made the journey from conviction to pardon. As their stories reveal, the pardon process is long and arduous. This Article recommends that governors adopt an expedited process for redemptive pardons so ex-offenders may have more timely relief from the burden of their collateral consequences.

The redemptive pardon serves an important role for ex-offenders who seek a second chance, but it is impossible for governors to consider and to grant the pardon applications of millions of ex-offenders. States must offer other remedies to ex-offenders that can also serve to ameliorate the impact of collateral consequences. This Article recommends changes to judicial expungement statutes, using Ohio as a model, to offer this needed relief.

The redemptive pardon and judicial expungement process will help ex-offenders in their ongoing struggle with the collateral consequences of their convictions, but true relief can only occur if there is an end to collateral consequences. This Article urges states to abolish collateral consequences and it highlights Ohio’s efforts as a model for this change.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: Pardon, Collateral Consequences, Judicial Expungement

JEL Classification: K1, K14

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 21, 2012 ; Last revised: March 20, 2012

Suggested Citation

Sahl, Joann M., Battling Collateral Consequences: The Long Road to Redemption (February 20, 2012). Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2013; U of Akron Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-01. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2008463 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2008463

Contact Information

Joann M. Sahl (Contact Author)
University of Akron School of Law ( email )
150 University Ave.
Akron, OH 44325-2901
United States
330-972-7189 (Phone)
330-972-6326 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,108
Downloads: 78
Download Rank: 183,571

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds