Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2008749
 
 

Footnotes (170)



 


 



The Normative Case for Normative Grand Juries


Josh Bowers


University of Virginia School of Law

February 21, 2012

Wake Forest Law Review, 2012
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-19

Abstract:     
The contemporary criminal justice system disposes of order-maintenance cases without much of any substantive litigation or public influence or oversight. Rather, these prosecutions are typically products of professional decision-making and are resolved by summary guilty pleas. This is no new insight. Indeed, a number of scholars have offered a range of reforms to address the perceived problems of assembly-line criminal justice. Inordinately, however, these adjudicative reforms tend to focus on the wrong question - the question of legal guilt. Instead, the issue with many order-maintenance prosecutions is not that the charges lack legal merit, but that the charges are equitably unfounded. Thus, the more appropriate focus of reform efforts is on the nontransparent discretionary charging decision. In this essay, which I prepared for a conference on community prosecution and defense, I propose a different kind of public participation in criminal justice. What I have in mind is a misdemeanor grand jury that would address only the normative - or extralegal - question of whether a public-order charge is equitably appropriate in the first instance. In offering this proposal, I do not claim that lay intuition is decidedly superior to professional perspective, only that some lay involvement is better than none when it comes to resolving equitable charging questions in normatively borderline cases. And, significantly, such a proposal is also consistent with the grand jury’s traditional role as the robust, transparently democratic, and decidedly equitable voice of the people in the charging process. Of course, questions remain over how to structure an efficient lay equitable screen that minimizes dangers of arbitrary or discriminatory decision-making. However, the possibilities for effective reform at least deserve exploration, and that is all I intend to do here. In any event, I offer this rough-and-ready proposal not as a universal solution, but as a potentially attractive option for prosecution offices that are committed already to the community-justice enterprise.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: Grand juries, community prosecution, community justice, equitable discretion, order-maintenance policing, order-maintenance prosecution, charging discretion, misdemeanors, legitimacy

JEL Classification: K40, K41, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 27, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Bowers, Josh, The Normative Case for Normative Grand Juries (February 21, 2012). Wake Forest Law Review, 2012; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2008749

Contact Information

Josh Bowers (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 545
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 174,894
Footnotes:  170

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.313 seconds