Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2008754
 
 

Footnotes (114)



 


 



Maturity


Jonathan Todres


Georgia State University College of Law

February 21, 2012

Houston Law Review, Vol. 48, pp. 1107-1165, 2012
Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-13

Abstract:     
Across numerous areas of the law — including family law, criminal law, labor law, health law, and other fields — when children are involved, maturity determinations are pivotal to outcomes. Upon reaching maturity, an individual has access to a range of rights not previously available and is expected to fulfill certain duties. Despite the central importance of maturity, the law’s approach to it has been to consider the concept in a piecemeal and issue-specific fashion. The result is a legal construct of maturity that is anything but consistent or coherent. For example, every state has a minimum age below which a child is considered not mature enough to consent to sex. However, if money is involved, more than forty states deem that child mature enough to have consented to sex for money and be charged with the crime of prostitution (even if the money is paid to a pimp and the child never sees it). This Article seeks to undertake a holistic assessment of the law’s approach to maturity.

Markers of maturity in the law frequently occur at different points in time. Children are deemed mature enough to participate in the polity (e.g., vote) at a different age from when they are deemed mature enough to exercise independent economic power (e.g., work), control their own bodies (e.g., engage in consensual sex), or assume adult social responsibilities (e.g., drink alcohol in public places). In short, the law provides little clear guidance on how maturity should be understood and treated. Recent research on brain development and the work of cognitive psychologists provide some answers. To date, however, a significant consideration has been largely overlooked: cultural conceptions of maturity. Thus, this Article seeks to incorporate cultural perspectives on maturity into the dialogue. More broadly, this Article aims to bring some clarity to the issue of maturity and examine whether cultural practices can inform the legal, policy, and moral questions in the law’s approach to maturity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: children, maturity, self-determination, culture, labor, juvenile justice, voting, accountability, consent, duties, rights

JEL Classification: J10, J13, K14, K12, K30, K31

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 21, 2012 ; Last revised: April 10, 2012

Suggested Citation

Todres, Jonathan, Maturity (February 21, 2012). Houston Law Review, Vol. 48, pp. 1107-1165, 2012; Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-13. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2008754

Contact Information

Jonathan Todres (Contact Author)
Georgia State University College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 812
Downloads: 158
Download Rank: 112,651
Footnotes:  114

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.296 seconds