Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009020
 
 

Footnotes (460)



 


 



Equality Qua Equality: A Comparative Critique of the Tiers of U.S. Equal Protection Doctrine


Lorenzo Di Silvio


Georgetown University Law Center

January 7, 2013


Abstract:     
On February 23, 2011, the Obama Administration announced that it would no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. Of great significance in this announcement was the Administration’s position that classifications on the basis of sexual orientation warrant heightened judicial scrutiny. Notwithstanding this announcement, the level of review applied to sexual-orientation classifications — and the manner in which a court determines whether a particular type of classification deserves more searching review — is an open question, the answer to which typically dictates the outcome of challenges to government classifications. Apart from this outcome determinativeness, affording heightened scrutiny to some classifications but not others sends the message that, as a society, we value select groups more — or at least will treat certain classifications more skeptically than others — rather than developing a theory of equality qua equality.

Equal protection doctrine need not function this way. By looking at comparative doctrine — specifically, the equality jurisprudence of Canada, South Africa, and the European Court of Human Rights — this Article shows how equality doctrine in the United States can be improved. By engaging in a two-stage review process, these other systems effectively control the floodgates of litigation challenging government classifications and provide guidance for when government actors may permissibly differentiate in a way that does not depend on the type of classification at issue. In addition to being a more principled approach to equality doctrine, the type of review in which Canada, South Africa, and the European Court of Human Rights engage both permits modern government to function and articulates a more holistic vision of equality qua equality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: Equality, Equal Protection, Levels of Scrutiny, Standard of Review, Tiers, Limitations Analysis, Proportionality, United States, Canada, South Africa, European Court of Human Rights, Comparative Law, Constitutional Law, Sexual Orientation

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 21, 2012 ; Last revised: January 7, 2013

Suggested Citation

Di Silvio, Lorenzo, Equality Qua Equality: A Comparative Critique of the Tiers of U.S. Equal Protection Doctrine (January 7, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009020 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2009020

Contact Information

Lorenzo Di Silvio (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 652
Downloads: 55
Download Rank: 221,796
Footnotes:  460

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds