Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009123
 
 

Footnotes (229)



 


 



Virtual Assembly


John D. Inazu


Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

February 21, 2012

Cornell Law Review, Forthcoming
Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-02-06

Abstract:     
This Article provides one of the first scholarly considerations of the constitutional boundaries for online groups. It explores both why and how we should protect these groups by asking two related questions. The first question is theoretical: do online groups implicate the kinds of values that warrant elevated constitutional protection. The second question is doctrinal: what is the best framework for providing constitutional protection to these groups.

The Article argues that we should protect online groups because they advance important First Amendment values and because the line between our offline and our online groups is collapsing. Turning to the doctrinal question, the Article draws from both historical sources and analogies to free speech doctrine to show that the First Amendment’s right of assembly is capacious enough to protect online groups. The Article concludes with some tentative applications of virtual assembly to legal controversies: an online forum that excludes on the basis of gender, a state law that prohibits private Facebook communications between teachers and students, an online church that expels dissident members, and an online dating service that makes only same-sex matches.

Virtual Assembly makes four contributions to emerging scholarship at the nexus of constitutional law, cyberlaw, sociology, and political theory. First, it demonstrates the normative and prudential reasons for protecting online groups. Second, it shows how expression includes the acts of exclusion, embrace, expulsion, and establishment (an observation that calls into question the Supreme Court’s category of “expressive association”). Third, it explains how the right of assembly applies in online contexts. Finally, it introduces the concept of nested groups — online groups that exist within other structural frameworks, such as Facebook and Internet service providers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: online groups, freedom of association, freedom of assembly, virtual groups, First Amendment

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 22, 2012 ; Last revised: July 13, 2014

Suggested Citation

Inazu, John D., Virtual Assembly (February 21, 2012). Cornell Law Review, Forthcoming; Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-02-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009123

Contact Information

John D. Inazu (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,229
Downloads: 168
Download Rank: 107,500
Footnotes:  229

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds