Predator Drone Attacks
New England Law | Boston
February 22, 2012
New England Law Review, Vol. 46, pp. 27-36, 2011
There have been both legal and policy criticisms of drone attacks. Much of the legal criticism has focused on alleged violations of international law and the law of war. These criticisms reflect a desire to place some controls on a State's use of force. While this international law debate is important, practically speaking, criticism alone would be unlikely to dissuade the United States from using drone attacks. Any real check must come domestically either from the judiciary or from Congress. This Essay contends that Congress, not the courts, is the only viable means of placing controls on the President's use of drone attacks in the future.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: Drone Attacks, National Security, Congress
JEL Classification: K10, K19Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 23, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.375 seconds