Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009425
 


 



Black Swans: Recapitulative Statements/VIES (VAT) & Use Tax Reciprocity (RST)


Richard Thompson Ainsworth


Boston University - School of Law; NYU - Graduate Tax Program

February 22, 2012

66 Tax Notes International 275 (April 16, 2012)
Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-10

Abstract:     
There is fundamentally no difference between a value added tax (VAT), and a retail sales tax (RST) when it comes to collecting the tax on cross-border sales. If (under a VAT) a seller is allowed to “zero-rate” cross-border sales, or if (under a RST) a seller is exempt from collecting the tax on cross-border sales, the critical enforcement question is exactly the same – how does the system assure that the buyer will self-assess (and pay) the tax?

The simple answer is that the tax administration audits. The more complicated answer notes that the effectiveness of the audit (by the destination jurisdiction) depends heavily on its ability to secure transactional data from the origin jurisdiction. Without a good information exchange mechanism this audit is difficult.

The EU’s data-sharing mechanism involves recapitulative statements by origin state sellers and a VAT Information Exchange System (VIES) that shares this information with the destination state. There is a technology-intensive proposal to do the same among the US states, the Use Tax Reciprocity (UTR) system.

The EU’s recapitulative statement/VIES network is a classic Black Swan, a program characterized by extraordinary cost overruns, extreme schedule delays, and dramatic shortfalls in realized benefits. Black Swans have an average cost overrun of 200%, and an average schedule overrun of 70%. The UTR has the same problems.

Program management professionals from the Harvard, Berkeley and Oxford business schools would suggest that the UTR promoters suffer from “Black Swan blindness.” They need to ask if this major IT project: (1) Can absorb the hit if the project goes over budget by 400%? (2) Can survive if only 25% to 50% of the projected benefits are realized? (3) Can take the hit if 15% of the medium-sized IT projects (secondary projects related to the main project) are also over budget by 200%? Many of the URT’s difficulties can be identified through a “reference class forecasting” study.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Black Swan, VIES, Recapitulative statements, Use Tax, SST, Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board, UTR, Use Tax Reciprocity, Reference class forecasting

JEL Classification: K19, K34

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 23, 2012 ; Last revised: July 24, 2012

Suggested Citation

Ainsworth, Richard Thompson, Black Swans: Recapitulative Statements/VIES (VAT) & Use Tax Reciprocity (RST) (February 22, 2012). 66 Tax Notes International 275 (April 16, 2012); Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009425 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2009425

Contact Information

Richard Thompson Ainsworth (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
NYU - Graduate Tax Program ( email )
Bobst Library, E-resource Acquisitions
20 Cooper Square 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10003-711
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 523
Downloads: 63
Download Rank: 211,002

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds