Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009610
 


 



Constitutionalizing Corruption: Citizens United, its Conceptions of Political Corruption, and the Implications for Judicial Elections Campaigns


Ofer Raban


University of Oregon - School of Law

February 22, 2012

University of San Francisco Law Review, Vol. 46, p. 479, 2012

Abstract:     
CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC invalidated a provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (“BCRA”) that prohibited corporations and unions from spending money on “electioneering communication.” The decision — which was written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a former lobbyist — was based on an exceedingly narrow definition of political corruption. This Article argues that the Court’s definition flies in the face of federal bribery laws, and that it fails to draw a meaningful distinction between corrupt and permissible political action. The Court’s poor reasoning is all the more unfortunate since, as this Article also explains, the Citizens United decision appears to be applicable to judicial elections as well.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: first amendment, campaign finance, citizens united, bribery

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 22, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Raban, Ofer, Constitutionalizing Corruption: Citizens United, its Conceptions of Political Corruption, and the Implications for Judicial Elections Campaigns (February 22, 2012). University of San Francisco Law Review, Vol. 46, p. 479, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009610

Contact Information

Ofer Raban (Contact Author)
University of Oregon - School of Law ( email )
1515 Agate Street
Eugene, OR 97403
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 765
Downloads: 126
Download Rank: 131,954

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.687 seconds