Changing the Leader – The Constitutional Conventions Concerning the Resignation of Prime Ministers and Premiers
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law
February 23, 2012
Federal Law Review, Vol. 39, pp. 329-360, 2011
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/13
When a Prime Minister or Premier loses the support of his or her own party and resigns, numerous constitutional issues arise. Does the resignation entail that of the entire government, or can there simply be a change of leader? Is the Governor-General, in appointing a new Prime Minister, obliged to act on the advice of the outgoing leader, or is it a matter of discretion, as governed by convention? What if a Prime Minister who has lost theparty leadership refuses to resign as Prime Minister? Can or should a Governor-General dismiss a Prime Minister who has lost party support if there has not yet been a vote of no confidence in Parliament? What if the Governor-General is asked to prorogue Parliament to avoid a vote of no confidence? What if a Prime Minister who has lost the confidence of his or her party seeks to reassert power by advising the Governor-General to dismiss Ministers or dissolve Parliament? This article addresses all these questions, drawing on precedents in Australia, Canada, Nigeria and Malaysia.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Keywords: Constitutional conventions, Parliament, Prime Minister, Premier, dismissal, reserve powers, Governor-General, resignation, Cabinet, vote of no confidence, prorogation, elections
JEL Classification: K10, K30Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 23, 2012 ; Last revised: February 28, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.937 seconds