|
||||
|
||||
Alexy on Necessity in Law and MoralsDennis PattersonEuropean University Institute; Rutgers University School of Law, Camden; Swansea University School of Law March 2012 Ratio Juris, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 47-58, 2012 Abstract: Robert Alexy has built his original theory of law upon pervasive claims for “necessary” features of law. In this article, I show that Alexy's claims suffer from two difficulties. First, Alexy is never clear about what he means by “necessity.” Second, Alexy writes as if there have been no challenges to claims of conceptual necessity. There have been such challenges and Alexy needs to answer them if his project is to succeed.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 23, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.562 seconds