Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009957
 
 

Footnotes (80)



 


 



The Uneasy Case for the Affordable Care Act


Stephen E. Sachs


Duke University School of Law

February 23, 2012

Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 75, No. 3, p. 17, 2012

Abstract:     
The constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act is sometimes said to be an "easy" question, with the Act's opponents relying more on fringe political ideology than mainstream legal arguments. This essay disagrees. While the mandate may win in the end, it won't be easy, and the arguments against it sound in law rather than politics.

Written to accompany and respond to Erwin Chemerinsky's essay in the same symposium, this essay argues that each substantive defense of the mandate is subject to doubt. While Congress could have avoided the issue by using its taxing power, it chose not to do so. Congress has power to regulate commerce among the several States, but that might not extend to every individual decision involving economic considerations -- walking rather than taking the bus, stargazing rather than renting movies, or carrying a gun in a school zone rather than hiring private bodyguards. Even the necessary-and-proper power, the strongest ground for the mandate, may stop short of letting Congress claim extraordinary powers to fix the problems created by its exercise of ordinary ones.

Because the mandate's opponents can find some support in existing doctrines, a decision striking down the mandate needn't be a drastic break from past practice. By contrast, a decision upholding the mandate would raise serious questions about the limits of Congress's powers. To many, these questions offer good reasons for doubting whether existing doctrine gets it right -- reasons having more to do with constitutional theory than political preference.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: Affordable Care Act, health care, minimum coverage, individual mandate, tax clause, commerce clause, necessary and proper clause

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K19, K3, K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 24, 2012 ; Last revised: April 11, 2012

Suggested Citation

Sachs, Stephen E., The Uneasy Case for the Affordable Care Act (February 23, 2012). Law & Contemporary Problems, Vol. 75, No. 3, p. 17, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2009957

Contact Information

Stephen E. Sachs (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-8542 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,929
Downloads: 863
Download Rank: 13,964
Footnotes:  80

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.282 seconds