The Triumph of Politics: Reflections on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union Validating the Inclusion of Non-EU Airlines in the Emissions Trading Scheme
Brian F. Havel
DePaul University College of Law
John Q. Mulligan
International Aviation Law Institute
February 1, 2012
Air and Space Law, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 3-33, 2012
Kluwer Law International, Forthcoming
DePaul Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-08
The planned extension of the EU emissions trading scheme to non-EU carriers has provoked vociferous opposition and prompted debate among scholars and practitioners of international and environmental law. U.S. airlines challenged the relevant EU directive in the English High Court, arguing that it is incompatible with international law. The High Court made a preliminary reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union. Advocate General Juliane Kokott provided an advisory opinion in October 2011 that upheld the validity of the directive. On December 21, 2011, the Court issued a judgment that largely adopts the Advocate General's reasoning. The article contends that the Advocate General and the Court, in their juristic pronouncements regarding the novel legal issues in this case, exalt political concerns over adherence to traditional understandings of fundamental principles of international aviation law, notably sovereignty, extraterritoriality, and the applicability of the Chicago Convention. The authors conclude that the integrity of the international aviation system depends upon levels of international cooperation that are inconsistent with the unilateralist, interest-driven readings of legal principle evident in both the Opinion and Judgment.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: Aviation, Emissions Trading Scheme, International LawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 23, 2012 ; Last revised: June 29, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds