|
||||
|
||||
Book Review: Justifying Intellectual Property by Robert P. Merges (Harvard 2011)Amy L. LandersUniversity of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law February 23, 2012 The IP Law Book Review, Forthcoming Abstract: Robert Merges’ scholarship has a continuing and significant influence on intellectual property law. His recent work, Justifying Intellectual Property, is a rich and thoughtful work that raises important questions. Merges considers the selected legal philosophers, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, and John Rawls, with depth and clarity. Difficult concepts are handled with thoroughness and subtlety. A number of the propositions are undoubtedly provocative. By placing the primary emphasis on the creator, the book seeks to move the focus of the IP system to one that, at an operational level, inures to the benefit of a professional creative class. This work emphasizes that intellectual property is a property right that allows creators to control who may use the work, and — if used — to specify the terms. In doing so, Merges neatly solves certain problems associated with the current IP system. Nevertheless, it is a rare case that one can attempt to move a system’s foundations without creating disruption. By advocating strong property rights in IP, Justifying Intellectual Property asserts a number of challenging propositions about a system that some currently regard as too powerful.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11 Keywords: Intellectual Property, IP Theory, Merges, Book Review Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 23, 2012 ; Last revised: February 24, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.437 seconds